The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal (fact-finding) ① Witness F, G, the defendant made a statement that he had a beer and beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for beer for be

2. The defendant and his defense counsel argued in the court below's reasoning of appeal that they are identical to the assertion of mistake, and the court below rejected the above argument in detail. In addition to the above judgment of the court below, the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below and the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence, i.e., the witness at the time, i., the court below stated that the defendant suffered bodily injury due to sprinking and beer, and the distance between the defendant and E was not less than 2 meters, and G statements that the defendant had been stated that at the time there was a beer be a beer bet and beer, etc. in several times, and that the whole of the case was not observed from the beginning. According to the photographs taken by the court below, the defendant cannot be deemed to have been witnessed from the beginning, but the defendant cannot be deemed to have suffered excessive harm to E from a narrow space between the defendant and E. According to the evidence taken by the defendant and E.