A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

10,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

On August 21, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to two years by the Suwon District Court for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., and was sentenced to two years on April 27, 201, and was not a person who completed the execution of the sentence in a military prison on April 27, 201.

On August 13, 2013, at around 22:00, the Defendant injected approximately 0.05g of psychotropic drugs, into a single-use injection machine, and melted them with water, and administered them into the blood transfusion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Notification of appraisal results of narcotics prepared by the Supreme Prosecutors' Office scientific investigation officers;

1. Investigation report (in cases of attaching, etc. photographs of the result of summary reagents);

1. Report on internal investigation (application, etc. for a warrant of seizure, search, inspection);

1. Criminal records and investigation reports (the confirmation of the date of the final release from office and current status of personal confinement) shall apply to previous criminal records and investigation reports;

1. Articles 60 (1) 2, 4 (1) 1, and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. of Specific Crimes;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (100,000 won at the time of sale) is that the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime, and again commits the crime in this case during the period of repeated crime, etc., which is disadvantageous to the defendant, and the sentencing factors favorable to the defendant are considered comprehensively, such as the fact that the defendant has repeatedly committed the crime in this case during the period of