Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a police officer working at the Guri Police Station B Team, who is engaged in criminal justice affairs.

No person engaged in criminal justice affairs shall divulge criminal justice information learned in the course of performing his/her duties, process such information without authority, provide other persons with such information for improper purposes.

Nevertheless, on July 15, 2016, the Defendant sought a divorce after receiving a loan from the her husband D from a high school and the Dong Changdong C.

In order to file a complaint, it was requested to refer to D's previous convictions that would help file a complaint.

On July 18, 2016, the Defendant connected the criminal justice information system (IPE) using a computer (IPE) used by him/her at the B Team office of the police station of 359 Gu-ri, Gu-ri, Dong-si, 201. On July 18, 2016, after entering the “F” resident registration number of D, who is not a person subject to investigation related to the case, inquired about the “F” of the prosecution’s case disposition results, and sent the screen to C by photographing it twice as a mobile phone as a result of the inquiry.

Accordingly, the defendant used criminal justice information for improper purposes such as disclosing criminal justice information or handling it without authority or providing it to others.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A copy of the statement made by the police in relation to C, a copy of the inspection report made by the victim, and a copy of the inspection report made by C;

1. Data and photographs of the criminal charge of duties, and the prosecution records of the leaked victim;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Relevant Article 15 (2) and Article 14 (3) of the Act on the Promotion of the Digitalization of Criminal Justice Process, the selection of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is examined, and the defendant recognized the criminal facts of this case and reflected his mistake, and it seems that he agreed with D.