logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.06.07 2018고단235
형사사법절차전자화촉진법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 16, 1988, the Defendant was appointed as prosecution investigators and served at the Seosan branch office of the Daejeon District Public Prosecutor's Office, etc., and served at the Suwon District Public Prosecutor's Office from May 17, 2010 to November 3, 2013, and currently served at the Gwangju District Public Prosecutor's Office.

No person engaged in criminal justice affairs shall divulge criminal justice information learned in the course of performing his/her duties, process such information without authority, provide other persons with such information for improper purposes.

On January 10, 2011, the Defendant served at the office of Suwon District Public Prosecutor's Office located in the Gu, No. 212-ro 52, Dong-gu, Suwon District Public Prosecutor's Office on January 10, 201, as a staff member of the Dispute Settlement Bank D operated by C from C.

Upon the request of the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office to find out the progress of a criminal case against E, access to the criminal justice information system without authority, search the fraudulent information of E being investigated in the Seoul Central Public Prosecutor's Office, and inform C of the criminal justice information, such as the progress of the case, by telephone. From around that time to June 1, 2012, the criminal justice information under investigation against E and C was informed to C in the above way 33 times as described in the list of crimes committed in the attached list.

Accordingly, the defendant used criminal justice information that he/she became aware of in the course of performing his/her duties for improper purposes such as disclosing criminal justice information or handling it without authority

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (the frequency of inquiry into the case by the person against whom such report is made, and attaching output of the screen of criminal judicial information

1. Article 15 (2) and Article 14 (3) of the Act on the Promotion of the Digitalization of Criminal Justice Process for the crime, the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

arrow