A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 18, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of official duties at the Daegu District Court, which was sentenced to six months of imprisonment, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 10, 2018.

On November 16, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, 363, and the head of each mountain subway station at the entrance of “each mountain subway station,” on November 16, 2012, stating that drunks are in large rooms; and (b) committed assault, such as the Defendant’s own right hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand, with a defect that the slope D belonging to the Daegu Dong-gu, Police Station C of the Daegu Dong-gu, who called the site at the site and called the site at the site, in order for the Defendant to return home.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate performance of duties on the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: A reply to inquiry about criminal history, reporting on the result of confirmation of the previous convictions in the disposition, screen of the case, and application of each statute of the judgment

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order and the order to attend a lecture are as follows: (a) the defendant committed the crime of this case while being tried for the same crime; (b) the defendant has been punished twice as the same crime including the crime for which the judgment in the judgment became final and conclusive; (c) the defendant reflects himself; and (d) the case and equity should be considered concurrently with the crime for which the judgment in the judgment in the judgment became final and conclusive; and (d) other conditions of sentencing indicated in the records such as the defendant's age