The defendant shall be innocent.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 01:01 on January 17, 2013, the Defendant publicly insulting the victim of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service by openly putting a notice on his own Internet B building No. 1202, which read “satisfing of the same Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service as a new one,” which read “satisfing of the new one, such as a new one,” by using a computer on his own Internet B building No. 1202, Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.”

2. The case holding that even in a case where a statement of fact does not contain an abstract judgment or a sacrific sentiment that may undermine people's social evaluation, and where a statement contains especially insulting expressions, if such expression can be deemed an act that does not violate social norms in light of the sound social norms of the times, illegality is exceptionally dismissed pursuant to Article 20 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2008Do1433, Jul. 10, 2008). The case held that the defendant, as his doctor, was "man's behavior of the opening of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service like the opening of the new Health Review and Assessment Service," the defendant's personal shoulder "man's act" was reduced in medical expenses even if the mother and doctor successively used the antibiotic system under the Ministry of Health and Welfare's notification as a acute engine disease, and thus, the defendant's assertion that the Central Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service did not give notice of his opinion to the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of the foregoing reduction of medical expenses."