The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Around October 30, 2012, the summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) on October 30, 2012, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house of Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Seoul, the Defendant specified the victim in his/her Kakaoto Ri, and (b) posted a notice stating “Iskn't have any influence on the part of the Defendant on the part of his/her own Kakaotory, hinging the male mast, hinginginginging, going back, going back, dyp, and having the mind well,” not having any influence on the part of the Defendant, but having any influence on the part of the Defendant.

2. The offense of insult as referred to in the crime of insult is an expression of an abstract judgment or a sacrific sentiment which does not indicate a fact, and even in a case where a speech contains a judgment or an expression of opinion that contains an insulting expression, if such expression can be deemed an act that does not contravene the social norms in light of the sound social norms of the age, illegality is exceptionally dismissed in accordance with Article 20 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2008Do1433, Jul. 10, 2008). According to the facts charged in the instant case, the part in the Defendant’s notice, referring to the victim, and referring to the victim, and referring to the victim, referring to the victim, and referring to the victim, and referring not to the sacrine, but to the sacrine, but to the sacrine, which is likely to damage the social reputation of the victim’s personal value.

However, examining the motive, circumstance, and background of the defendant's writing written on the bulletin board, the above article is written in order for the victim's and the defendant's friendships to write out a severe comments in the Kakakaoto Ri and to speak, and it includes the contents that only the victim's and the defendant's friendships including D, and the insulting expressions are not significant in the whole text.