1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning for the judgment of the first instance except for the dismissal or addition of a part of the judgment of the first instance under Paragraph (2) below. Thus, this part is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The part which is dismissed or added.

(a) Forms 8, 19 through 9, relating to the grounds for recognition, are as follows:

"The purpose of the whole pleadings and arguments" is the evidence mentioned above, Gap evidence 23, Eul evidence 24-1, Eul evidence 24-1, Eul evidence 30, 40, Eul evidence 42-1, 2-2, Eul evidence 2-1 through 4, Eul evidence 6-1 through 8, Eul evidence 7 through 10, 22 through 25, 27 through 31, Eul evidence 32-1, 2, Eul evidence 33 through 35, 37, part of Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, witness of the first instance court, witness of the court of first instance, witness of the court, witness of the court of first instance, Eul evidence of the court, each written testimony of Eul, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. The grounds of appeal Nos. 1 to 3 are as follows.

“B) B) A tried to submit a complaint in the fourth economic area according to the guidance of the public service center of the B police station, but the person in charge of the fourth economic area at the time was refused to accept C’s complaint.

The following is added at the end of the 11th century. The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff did not have a duty to provide counseling services, such as receipt of a written complaint, to the plaintiff who had worked as the head of the situation office at the time of the Rules on Watchkeeping, so even if the plaintiff refused to accept the written complaint, it is not illegal.

Pursuant to Article 15 of the Regulations on Watchkeeping of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Police Agency and the Police Station (A No. 24-2, hereinafter “Rules on Watchkeeping”), the chief of the situation office at the time of the on duty service is appropriate for the composition of the on duty under his/her control;

2. Inspection and verification of the office fixtures for workers on duty;

3. Status of work by separation from one's post;

4. Other situations in which the worker on duty was on duty;

5. At least once a week during which he/she works;