1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The court of first instance, citing the judgment of the court of first instance, deemed legitimate in finding facts and determining the evidence submitted by the plaintiff in this court, based on the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court of first instance.

Therefore, this court's decision is citing the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the following "2." This Court's decision as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts in height:

A. On the 3th 11st 11th 11th 1 of the judgment of the first instance court, “A person other than the lawsuit knew or could have known that he or she had no knowledge of his or her ability or intent to return the deposit,” “The fact that the person other than the lawsuit has purchased the apartment of this case at a price at a discount of 30%, and that there was a good broker for other real estate owned by the non-party (Seoul Seo-gu E Apartment 101, 701, 701).”

(b) 3. The acquisition value of the Nonparty shall be added to the “actual market value” next to the “actual market value” of 12.

(c) change “50 per cent” of the 3rd 17 parallels to “30 per cent”;

Between 4 and 14, the following facts are added: “The Nonparty was sold at a price lower than the actual sale price, or it is insufficient to recognize that the Defendants knew of such fact and did not notify the Plaintiff of the fact, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.”

(e) eliminate 4 pages 14,00,000.

(f) 4. 17 pages “(A No. 10)” added to “the Plaintiff, as alleged by the Plaintiff, will have received a loan from a bank under the guarantee insurance of the Korea Housing Finance Corporation, and received a security deposit, and if the market price has lowered as otherwise alleged by the Plaintiff, it would have not been deemed that a guarantee insurance contract or a loan approval would not have been granted.”

G. The Defendant C does not have any evidence to deem that it had mediated other real estate owned by the Nonparty between five and eighteen (17). According to the statement of evidence No. 13, Defendant B.