The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On August 20, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 14:30 on August 20, 2016, on the second floor of the D Building in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with several persons, such as private teaching institutes staff and students, around the second floor of the D Building in Seocho-gu, Seoul; (b) brought the victim G with his hands; and (c) brought the victim G with his hands; and (d) “I did not sn

freshed fresh, and if applicable, she committed suicide;

The victim's expression " shall commit a suicide, ........................, the victim's expression will commit a suicide at the weekend.

“.....”

Accordingly, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the fact that the defendant made the victim’s warning as stated in the facts charged is recognized.

However, at that time, F, the only person who wishes to the end of the victim and the defendant at the scene, seems to be the person who can expect another person not to be able to be able to unwrittenly in light of the pro-friendly and trust relationship with the victim.

Ultimately, it is difficult to readily conclude that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone had the possibility of spreading the Defendant’s horses to others without any reasonable doubt, and there is no other evidence to prove that there was a performance that means the situation in which an unspecified or multiple number of people can be recognized.

3. According to the conclusion, the facts charged constitute a case where there is no proof of criminal facts, and thus, the defendant is acquitted according to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

In addition, as the defendant does not consent to a public announcement of the judgment of innocence, it shall not be announced to the effect that the judgment of innocence is published in accordance with the proviso of Article 58 (2) of the Criminal Act.