beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On August 7, 2017, the Defendant driven a B-type cargo vehicle without obtaining a driver's license from around 50 meters on the front of solar real estate located in approximately 790 meters in the 786 Man-do, a Man-do, a Man-ro, a Man-ro, a Man-ro, a Man-ro (Man-do), which is the Man-do (Man-do).
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of driver's licenses;
1. The crime of this case on the grounds of the pertinent Article of the Act and Articles 152 subparag. 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime of this case is the case where the defendant drives a vehicle without obtaining a driver's license, and the nature of the crime is not good. The defendant was revoked on August 8, 2004, and there was a record of six times punishment due to the same traffic crime, such as the violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (toxic Driving). In particular, in light of the fact that the defendant was sentenced one year to a suspended sentence of four months on June 27, 2017 and was sentenced one year on suspension of the execution, and the defendant was also punished for the crime of this case at the point of time of the suspension of the execution of the sentence, it is inevitable to punish the defendant with severe responsibility.
However, considering the favorable circumstances of the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant led to the confession of the instant crime, the Defendant did not cause any other damage, such as traffic accidents, etc., and endeavored to prevent re-offending, etc., the Defendant’s age, family relation, sex behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the instant crime, means and method of the crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the punishment as per Disposition shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the factors of sentencing indicated in the record, such as the Defendant’