A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 28, 2014, from around 15:00 to 15:25 of the same day, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim D (the 52-year-old) from May 28, 2014, the Defendant: (a) took a bath, under the influence of alcohol, that he gets involved in drinking without permission in the presence of other customers; and (b) took a bath, such as “the wres to sing the wres,” while drinking alcohol, and obstructed the victim’s restaurant business for about 25 minutes by force.

2. On May 28, 2014, at the above restaurant around 15:25, the Defendant was subject to the control from G in the circumstances where he was dispatched after receiving 112 a report on the disturbance at the above restaurant, and received 15:25, the Defendant: “I am aware of whether I would like to know whether I would like to go? I would like to go? I would like to know whether I would go? I would go? I would like to go? I would like to go to go. I am, I would like to say I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am am. I am. I am. I

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning reporting duties and suppression of crimes by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement made to D and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of work place;

1. Relevant statutory provisions for criminal facts, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with performance of duties), and the choice of each fine (the quality of each crime committed in the form of not undermining the quality of a criminal act in the form of a crime in the form of a crime in the form of a crime in the form of a crime in the form of a 30-year breadth Act, the fact that there is no criminal record except for a fine of 70,000 won due to a violation of the Act on the Management of Exposures prior to the said 30-year breadth

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defense counsel of the defendant under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be drunk at the time of each crime committed by the defendant.