logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.10.20 2017고단415
명예훼손등
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

Reasons

1. On January 15, 2015, the Defendant’s summary of the facts charged in the “F Art Institute” operated by the Victim E in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the part of the Defendant: (a) did not establish an inappropriate relationship with the Plaintiff’s student G, and (b) did not pay the Plaintiff the Plaintiff the assessed fees to the Plaintiff, and (c) did not have any useful facts, the Defendant would report the Plaintiff’s vehicle to the Plaintiff, including H, I, and J, for the purpose of getting the Plaintiff’s student to discontinue his/her educational institute and register the Plaintiff’s student’s institute with the view to having the Plaintiff registered the Plaintiff’s institute.

“.....”

As a result, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing false facts, and at the same time spread false facts, thereby hindering the operation of the victim’s private teaching institute.

2. Defendant's assertion;

A. There is no fact that the student told him/her of the relationship between the president and G.

B. In the case of the F Art Institute, the tuition fees, in addition to the tuition fees, were separately received from all students.

However, the picture of the students who lack the ability to practice was not evaluated as a professor, and the Fartistic Institute of Art did not return the tuition evaluation fee to the students.

On January 2015, there is only an explanation of the reason for resignation to the student who had been given guidance after the retirement of the FF Institute from office.

3. Determination

A. (1) We examine whether the Defendant told the students of the F Art Institute of Arts to “the E president, by establishing an inappropriate relationship with G’s students, thereby promptly concluding the G’s invention to the G’s students.”

Shedic evidence consistent with this is H’s police statement (the investigation record of H 85 pages).

However, H, in this Court, the “E president” means that the G president has granted the right to report to the prospective students.

That is, there is a need to keep them in the police where they are friendly.

arrow