Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, on June 10, 2015, operated the victim C (41 tax) in front of the entrance of the entrance of the 440-1 china Radar located in the 440-1 of the Jinan-si, Jin-si, Jin-si around 00:15.

D In the future of the lele-car, the victim, who had been in dispute with the Ale-car in the future, was fluently fluored, bitched, bitched, bitched, bitched, and bitched on theme to be "the bitch bitch," and used the victim's fluor on the part of the defendant's chest, who was fluened by the defendant's chest.

2. The Defendant damaged property at the same time and place as Paragraph 1, and on the above grounds, the Defendant destroyed the damaged vehicle to have approximately KRW 770,000,000,000 on two to three occasions, which is marked down on the left-hand part of the victim’s lehacker, which was owned by the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and E;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Data on photographs of damaged vehicles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (report attached to a written estimate);

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of damage to property) and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. As to the point of the argument first, the defendant's act of assaulting the victim C's chest part on the chest part of the chest, but it is not a crime committed in the course of threatening the victim to attack the defendant with the vehicle, and immediately after the victim gets on the vehicle, as the victim threatened the defendant with shock, and then, threatening the defendant to defend him/her, and constitutes a legitimate defense or a legitimate act.

Next, with respect to the damage of property, the defendant did not consent to the damaged vehicle at all, and even if not, the facts charged.