Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, by a fine of 700,000 won, and by a fine of 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On April 17, 2017, at around 02:11, the Defendants assaulted the victim F's face on one occasion with the victim F's friendship G. Defendant A assaulted the victim's face on two occasions with his left hand, and Defendant B assaulted the victim's face on one occasion with the victim's head, and assaulted the victim's face on two occasions with the victim's left hand. Defendant B assaulted the victim's f face on two occasions with the victim's face walking on two occasions, and Defendant C assaulted the victim's f face on two occasions with the victim's f face walking on one occasion with the upper part. Defendant C assaulted the victim's bridge part of the victim's f's f's face on one occasion with the victim's f's hair, she did so with the victim's face on two occasions by drinking, and distributed the victim's f's face on two occasions with the victim's hair's head, eye damage, eye and other surrounding part during two weeks.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (the 14th time a month);

1. Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 2(2)3 of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of a fine, and the selection of a fine

1. The part concerning the dismissal of public prosecution under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act by detention in the workhouse (the Defendants)

1. On April 17, 2017, Defendant A assaulted the victim G(33 years old)’s flabing around the “E main store located in Kuju-si” before Defendant A around 02:11, 201.

2. The judgment of this part of the facts charged is a crime falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's will specifically manifested pursuant to Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records of this case, the fact that the above victim expressed his/her intention not to punish the above defendant can be acknowledged. Thus, this part of the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.