logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.01.13 2015고단1920
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 13, 2015, at around 16:54, the Defendant: (a) was driving a C-car without wearing a safety belt in front of the bus stop located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu; and (b) on the ground that the Defendant was driving a C-car without wearing a safety belt, the Defendant controlled the transportation expenses of the police station in the Gyeonggi-nam-gu, the police officers D, and E working at the relevant place, and issued a penalty payment notice to the above D, who was issued a penalty payment notice.

“Along with the time limit,” the above D sent a notice to the above D that “I may visit the public service center of the original police station to raise an objection if there is an objection in relation to the imposition of the penalty,” and that D want to take a patrol car off from the said car, and that D is responsible for the said car.

“A high sound, the foregoing E prevents the Defendant, and “A person who raises an objection or raises a civil petition in the course of the control shall move to the public service center of the police station at present, and we shall now move to the traffic communication service in the intersection.” They shall open a steering gate in front of the patrol vehicle and read “A person who will go to the police station” and prevent the Defendant from operating the patrol vehicle by inserting his arms in the crepit, and by continuing to stop the Defendant’s act, the said E’s chest was cut down in two hands, with the hands that the said E continued to stop the Defendant’s act.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of traffic accidents and traffic communication service of the above D and E by force, and at the same time, the Defendant placed light salt in need of treatment for approximately two weeks to the above E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. Video recorded CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257(1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense (the injury is the case.

arrow