logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.06.14 2018고단1066
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The defendant shall pay 270,000 won to the applicant C, and 250.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On January 14, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Gangnam Branch Branch of the Chuncheon District Court, and the Defendant was released on April 29, 2016 in the prison and terminated the execution of the said sentence on June 16, 2016.

[2] On February 21, 2018, the Defendant, “2018 Highest 1066,” by using a mobile phone at the her mother conference located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan GovernmentO, sent a notice to NAV and then sent KRW 720,000 to the victim E who sent a mobile phone text message, and then sent KRW 720,000 to the victim E who sent a mobile phone text message.

However, at the time of fact, the defendant thought that the victim would use it as living expenses, etc., and did not have the intention or ability to send the Nowon-gu to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant deceiving the victims as above and received KRW 720,00 from the victim's bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day from the victim, and acquired the same amount of property profits, etc., and deceiving the victims over 32 times from that time until March 14, 2018, and then acquiring property profits equivalent to the sum of KRW 10,345,000 from the victims.

"2018 Highest 1475"

1. On January 28, 2018, the victim M-related Defendant made a false statement to the victim M-M who became aware of at a place where it is not known around January 28, 2018, and at the site of Q’s “T” did not receive proper treatment because there was no hospital expenses, etc. as well as there was no person in charge of care. The victim M-related Defendant made a false statement to the victim M-M, who used the Kakao Stockholm, that “on the loan of the car fee to the victim” would have to be repaid.

However, in fact, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay living expenses and personal debts by receiving money from the injured party under the ice that he is in the face of cryposis.

arrow