logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.10.10 2017고단6526
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 21, 2017, at around 21:30 on September 21, 2017, the Defendant interfered with his/her duties: “A victim C and his/her employee D (e.g., aged 21) working at the victim C and his/her place in the I store operated by the victim C (31 older) located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Chin”), “Amar” and “Chin.”

The victim’s task operation was hindered by force by 7 to 8 visitors who were outside the 15 minutes of his/her pedal, such as marching and singinginging off the pedal.

2. On September 21, 2017, around 21:45, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) the Defendant: (b) recommended a person under the influence of alcohol in front of the I store located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to return home, and (c) the security guards E belonging to the Seoul Police Station J District was called out after receiving a report that the person under the influence of alcohol in front of the I store located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; and (b) the Defendant:

Police Dol Dol

”라고 욕설을 하면서 오른손 엄지와 검지 사이 안쪽 손날로 목을 1회 강하게 치며 잡아 조르고, 위와 같은 이유로 현행 범인으로 체포되어 가 던 중 발로 경위 E의 왼쪽 정강이를 1회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of police officers' reports and arrest of flagrant offenders.

3. Around 22:00 on September 21, 2017, the Defendant’s insultd the victim M (30 years), F (28 years old), N (25 years old), a police officer working at the police station in the foregoing place, who was working at the police station (30 years old), and F (28 years old), and F (25 years old); and (d) the Defendant raised and omitted the Plaintiff’s son, a bitch, a bitch opening council;

I have recently expressed a great obses, I have expressed myme to this part of the member of the National Assembly, that this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part, and the victim N of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this

“Along with this year’s response, this year’s response was sent to the public, i.e., “N. the same year for the low-end year” and “N.h. for the public interest.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each of the witnesses C, D, E, and F.

arrow