logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2013.07.03 2013고단62
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who engages in the business of driving Category C truck.

On January 28, 2013, the Defendant driven the above truck on January 11:45, 2013, and driven the front road of the “Hamart” in the early chilling operation at the early chilling of the Gu, along the two-lanes from the side of the bridge to the front speed bus terminal.

In this case, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to keep the victim D(the age of 59) who was standing in the signal atmosphere due to negligence that did not properly look at the front of the vehicle without a license, and did not avoid the low-speed car, which was driven by the victim D(the age of 59) and was driven by the Defendant, and received the back part of the above car driven by the victim D with the front part of the above truck driven by the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above business, the injury to the victim D, the injury to the fluoral base in need of light-based treatment for about two weeks, the injury to the fluoral base in need of light-based treatment for about two weeks, the injury to the fluoral base in need of light-based treatment for about two weeks, and the injury to the victim H (the fluor, 57 years old) in need of light-based treatment for about two weeks.

2. On January 28, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (e.g., refusal to take a drunk measurement) (e., refusal to take a drunk measurement) on the ground that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that he/she was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling from K in the workplace located in the J District of the Seocho Police Station where he/she was dispatched after receiving a report of traffic accidents under the influence of alcohol, as described in paragraph (1) at an emergency room of the Seocho-si Office in the Seocho-si (hereinafter referred to as the “I Hospital”).

arrow