A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 10, 2017, the Defendant, at the D convenience store located in Jinju City, around 06:00 on March 10, 2017, engaged in a mutual conflict with each other due to the Defendant’s labing of Kim(s) and sandd position purchased from the victim E, who is an employee, in the calculation column, and caused a conflict with each other. In doing so, the Defendant, while assaulting the victim, expressed the plebs of the clothes of the victim, and she expressed the plebs of the clothes, and she expressed the brus of the clothes, and she expressed the brus of the clothes, and she expressed the flabing of the 10 minutes, and obstructed the victim’s convenience store business by force

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as report on internal accidents and CCTV photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommendations] : (a) the mitigation area (including one month to eight months) of the mitigated area (including efforts to recover damage), the decision of sentence] the accused has several criminal records related to violence, such as injury, and the accused has been sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for six months from his/her imprisonment with labor for the crime of obstruction of business and insult from the Busan Franchi Board: Provided, That the accused is against a crime; (b) the accused has agreed with the victim; and (c) the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the accused has been taken into account together with the order.

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. On March 10, 2017, at the D convenience store located in Jinju City, on March 10, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim E (36 years), an employee, on the part of the Defendant, on the part of the Defendant, that he purchased the cream and sand position in the calculation unit, and that he left the cream seat “calculated” against each other, such as the victim’s ebbbbbbbage, and ebbbling the victim’s brea, and three times the victim’s boom with his hand.

2. The above facts charged constitute a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 260.