A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 13, 2016, the Defendant, at around 04:37, obstructed the operation of convenience stores by force of about five minutes, such as setting coffee containers at the display site in hand, cutting off the floor and cutting down goods at the display site, which are located at the convenience store D located in Young-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and assaulting the victim on one occasion on the part of this part of the victim E, who is an employee, and reporting the victim to the police. The Defendant obstructed the operation of convenience stores by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each E statement;

1. A criminal investigation report (as to the confirmation ofCCTV and the attachment of CCTV closure photographs)

1. A damaged photograph and a photograph of a CCTV with interference with business affairs to capture;

1. Application of CCTV CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (The following conditions favorable to the defendant among the reasons for sentencing) [the scope of recommendation] interference with the affairs of category 1 (In the event that the degree of power and deceptive scheme or the degree of interference with business is minor, the scope of sentence compared with the recommended one: January to August (the decision of sentence] - Six months (the decision of sentence] - Six times the period of punishment for violent crimes committed against the defendant was more than six times, and the period of punishment is more favorable to the defendant - The circumstances favorable to the defendant - The number of special mitigations, erroneous recognition of errors, and other matters favorable to the defendant - The summary of the facts charged of assault among the facts charged of this case, which are the basis for sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, is located at the location of the defendant's convenience in calculating the victim's plastic code around August 13, 2016.