A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 29, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and a summary order of KRW 3,500,000 for a fine by the same court on December 12, 2013, respectively.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle with soflurt from D.

1. The Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act twice or more, and driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.259% from the blood alcohol concentration on the road from around 23:40 on January 19, 2017 to the road in front of the same e-mail at around 0.259% on the road from around 23:40 on January 19, 2017.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Measures Taken after Accidents) and violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) led the Defendant to proceed in the direction of making a week from the direction of the west-si at the time of making a week on the day referred to in the preceding paragraph.

Since there is a center of separation, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle according to the right side of the center.

Nevertheless, under the influence of liquor, the Defendant was negligent in driving in the station according to the left-hand side of the central separation unit, and the facts charged against the Victim F, which was under way on the above road, changed to the J or the F, the owner of the vehicle, the driving vehicle, and damaged the front-hand part of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the Defendant, thereby undermining the repair cost of KRW 2,411,200, without taking necessary measures.

The Defendant continued to drive 50 meters in a state where the normal driving is difficult due to the occurrence of a traffic accident as seen above, and the Defendant got a victim H(24 Do) driver’s 1-lane driving of the said road.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s above work performance.