beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.
However, as to Defendant B, this shall not apply.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A
A. A. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (A.S.A.) by the Defendant is a person engaged in driving a E-A6 car.
On September 8, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car at around 05:58, and led the front of the “G cafeteria” road located in F of the Daegu Suwon-gu, to go about about 30km each other at the speed of about 30km between the three-lane floodside and the two-lane road inside the inside.
At all times, there is a central separation for preventing unauthorized crossing, and thus at night, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the steering gear and brakes by accurately manipulating the steering gear and brakes.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not stop and stop immediately, and left the site without taking necessary measures, when there was a danger of other traffic accidents, such as over 10 meters in water scattered on the road, by destroying the center separation unit to the extent that the amount equivalent to KRW 1,300,000 of the repair cost, which is around 10 meters in front of the left side of the said vehicle, by neglecting the center to check the Hand-on letters, and neglecting the center for preventing unauthorized crossing.
B. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Non-licenseless Driving) driving of a vehicle listed in paragraph (a) without obtaining a driver’s license from approximately 300 meters section before the “G cafeteria” road located in H in Daegu L-ro, Daegu-ro, as described in paragraph (a) of Article 1 to the “G cafeteria” road as listed in paragraph (a) of Article 1.
(c)
In order to conceal the occurrence of a non-licensed driving event due to the occurrence of a traffic accident at the time, such as the statement of “A” in Article 1, the Defendant is deemed to have made mistake on September 9, 2016 in the indictment written around September 8, 2016, and there is no hindrance to the Defendant’s exercise of the right to defense. Thus, the Defendant ex officio recognized as above.
at the I point of "B" in Section 1.