1. The defendant shall make the plaintiffs' share of F. F. F. 493 square meters in the proportion of inheritance shares listed in the annexed inheritance share sheet.

1. Basic facts

A. On the ground of its land cadastre (hereinafter both its land cadastre and its current land cadastre), F-road 493 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) is indicated only as the land owned by Nonparty G, which was assessed on September 10, 191, and there is no other entry that could identify Dong, such as the address of the above G, etc.

B. The instant land is unregistered land.

C. On December 27, 1926, the net I (I and J) whose legal domicile of the H is the Simsan-si, died on December 27, 1926

In South Korea, the deceased K(L) who is a family heir has solely succeeded to the net I's property.

On December 16, 1974, the deceased on Dec. 16, 1974, the deceased wife M (on the time), the plaintiff A and the head of the son, who is the plaintiff C, the plaintiff D, and the son, who is the family heir, were jointly succeeded to the deceased's property according to the legal share of the deceased.

Since then, the deceased M was deceased on September 15, 1987 and the deceased M was inherited by the deceased M, and the plaintiffs were jointly inherited according to the statutory shares at the time of the death.

The plaintiffs' final inheritance shares in the first net I's property are the plaintiffs' inheritance shares in attached Form 1's inheritance shares.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap's 1 through 5 (Additional number omitted), Eul's 1 through 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Assertion and determination

A. G, which is indicated as the owner of the instant land in the land cadastre of the Plaintiffs’ assertion, is the network I, the plaintiffs’ assistance.

Therefore, the land of this case is the land owned by the plaintiffs inherited as shown in the attached inheritance shares list.

B. G as indicated in the Defendant’s assertion land cadastre, and net I, as an assistant to the Plaintiffs, may not be readily concluded that the same person is the same, depending on the name of Chinese character.

C. The names of G as indicated in the land cadastre 1 and the Plaintiffs’ lighting I are different.

However, the part corresponding to the number of copies in front of the N's "N" and "O" are replaced.