logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.06.20 2017가단1338
건물철거 및 토지인도
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B, among the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, marks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1 of the separate sheet No. 1.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On January 2, 2007, the Plaintiff acquired real estate listed in the [Attachment List (hereinafter “instant land”) for a public auction.

B. From around that time, Defendant B owned a building of 34 square meters in part of “11 square meters (a prefabricated-type building)” (a prefabricated-type building) connected in the instant land in sequence with each point of indication 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1 of the annexed drawings among the instant land, and a building of 34 square meters (a prefabricated-type panel building) connected in sequence of each point of 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 6 of the same drawings. Defendant C and D jointly owned a building of 6 square meters (a prefabricated-type building) connected in the instant land, which connects each point of 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 11 of the annexed drawings.

C. The amount equivalent to the rent from October 1, 2007 to September 30, 2017 of the entire land of this case is as the result of an appraisal and assessment in attached Form (Provided, That “ August 31, 2017” as indicated in the column of “the period of appraisal of rent” in the second table is deemed as “ September 30, 2017”; and the amount equivalent to the rent from October 1, 2017 to KRW 141,825 per month is deemed as equivalent.

Accordingly, the amount equivalent to the rent amount equivalent to the area of 1, 2, 3, 3 shall be calculated as follows:

(F) On October 1, 2007, from October 1, 2007 to September 30, 2017, rent 11,342,58 m2, 45 m2, 45 m2, 45 m2, 104,625 m2, 13,950 m2, 641 m2,341 m2, 650 m2, 625 m2, 200 m3: there is no dispute; there is no dispute; Gap evidence; the result of the commission of appraisal to appraiser E, as a result of the commission of appraisal to appraiser E

2. According to the above facts, Defendant B owned a building on the land of 11 square meters and part on the land of 34 square meters as indicated in the annexed drawing among the instant land, and occupied a total of 45 square meters of the above land. Defendant C and D jointly own a building on the land of 6 square meters as indicated in the annexed drawing, among the instant land.

arrow