logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2012.10.19 2012고정41
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 19:40 on November 2, 201, the Defendant held a community conference with the victim E (the age of 48) who is a Saemaul leader in the D cafeteria located in the official city in the official city in the public city in the public city, and the Defendant, on the ground that the victim, who is well in the role of the Saemaul leader, was able to play a Saemaul leader, brought the victim a light, such as a horse bridge, breath, which requires approximately 28-day medical treatment to the victim by putting the victim’s face, booming the breath and cutting the bridge over the floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F, G and H, and witness I's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of G and F;

1. Each investigation report (general, not more than 35 pages of investigation records, general, dentists' counter-investigation/general, and counter-investigation of witnesses);

1. Inquiries into the fact by J Hospital and details of health insurance benefits;

1. Each injury diagnosis certificate and opinion;

1. Application of field photographs and photographs statutes;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the defendant and his defense counsel under Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of the river basin are consistent with the defendant's breath and fighting with the victim's body. However, the defendant did not assault the victim, such as the victim's statement, and the victim's statement does not have credibility even in light of other witness's testimony.

In full view of the above evidence, the defendant and the victim can at least recognize the fact that she had a spath and spathical spathical spathical spathical spath, and that there was a spathical spathical spathical spath, and further, the victim's statements and statements made by the victim at K Hospital at night, the victim's photographs taken the upper part of the spathic spathic part of the victim's entrance into the hospital at night, the victim received dental treatment from the next day, and the victim complained of the spathic spath and s

arrow