logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.10.27 2017가단3354
건물인도
Text

1. The defendant

(a) Indication of the attached drawing among the first floor of the building indicated in the attached list, (1), (2), (3), (4), and (1);

Reasons

1. On October 26, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant by setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 3 million, monthly rent of KRW 500,00,000, and June 7, 2017, with respect to the portion of KRW 31.92 square meters in the ship connected in sequence, among the first floor of the building listed in the separate sheet with the Defendant, as indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “leased”).

The defendant did not pay a monthly rent once after the conclusion of a lease contract.

The plaintiff terminated the lease contract on the ground that the service of the complaint of this case did not pay the rent.

The defendant is obligated to deliver the leased object to the plaintiff.

The Plaintiff appropriated the lease deposit with the overdue charge until March 26, 2017.

The Defendant is obligated to return to the Plaintiff unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent calculated by the ratio of KRW 500,000 per month from March 27, 2017 to the time when the leased object is transferred.

2. Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow