1. 피고는 원고에게 별지 목록 기재 건물 1층 중 별지 도면 표시 ㈒, ㈓, ㈔, ㈕, ㈒의 각 점을...

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged by adding the whole purport of the pleadings to each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 5.

원고는 2011. 9. 2. 피고에게 별지 목록 기재 건물 1층 중 별지 도면 표시 ㈒, ㈓, ㈔, ㈕, ㈒의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 33.05㎡(이하, ‘이 사건 임대목적물’이라고 한다)를 임대차보증금 1억 2,000만 원, 월 임료 450만 원(부가세 별도), 임대차기간 2011. 9. 2.부터 2013. 9. 1.까지로 정하여 임대하기로 하는 임대차계약(이하, ‘이 사건 임대차계약’이라고 한다)을 체결하였다.

The Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to set the monthly management expenses to be paid by the Defendant as KRW 5,00 per deliberation and to pay the surcharge separately.

B. From August 2013, the Defendant did not pay rent, and the Plaintiff expressed the Defendant’s intent to terminate the instant contract on the grounds of the Defendant’s failure to pay rent by delivery of the instant complaint.

C. On September 2, 2014, the Defendant paid all the rent and management expenses in arrears to the Plaintiff during the instant lawsuit, but again did not pay the rent and management expenses for September 2, 2014 and the payment of the rent and management expenses up to September 2014.

2. According to the above facts finding, it is reasonable to view that the lease contract of this case was terminated by the termination of the contract of this case for the reason of delinquency in rent of the defendant. Thus, barring any other special circumstance, the defendant is obligated to deliver the leased object to the plaintiff.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable and acceptable.