1. The public prosecution against Defendant A is dismissed.

2. The punishment against Defendant B is a fine of KRW 3,00,000 (three million).

Punishment of the crime

(Defendant B) On July 9, 2016, at around 20:00, Defendant B assaulted the victim A (the 62-year-old age) who is a customer in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and assaulted the victim’s neck, against it, Defendant B assaulted the victim’s neck, drinking, and the victim’s neck on one occasion, and thereby suffered from the victim’s 31-day surgery.

Summary of Evidence

(Defendant B)

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Co-defendant A’s legal statement and Defendant A’s written statement

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the written diagnosis of injury (Defendant B);

1. Article 262 and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts (the selection of a fine, taking into account the facts that an injured party has failed to punish him/her and that the injured party has intended not to punish him/her);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant A) dismissing the prosecution of the provisional payment order against Defendant A. The facts charged against Defendant A are as follows: around 20:00 on July 9, 2016, Defendant A used the victim E (the victim E, who is an employee in charge of calculation in the Dart located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, for the reason that the victim E (the victim 43 years old) did not ask whether or not to set points accumulated; Defendant B (the victim 36 years old) was the co-defendant and the victim (the victim - the victim - the victim - the victim - the victim - the victim - the victim - the victim - the victim - the victim - the victim - the victim - the victim - the victim - the victim - the face face of the victim - one time at the same time, and assault the victim - the victim her back head from the victim'

The crime of violence falls under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and shall not be prosecuted against the express will of the victim under paragraph (3) of the same Article.

Since the victims expressed their intention not to be punished for the defendant after filing the prosecution of this case, the prosecution of each of the assault of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.