logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.08.20 2020고정780
폭행등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On May 20, 2019, around 22:00, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim D in Daegu Dong-gu B Apartment-gu, Daegu-gu, 2019, by stating that “I would not know that I would not cause any birth; (b) her pregnancy would not be possible; and (c) her pregnancy would not only be possible if she is pregnant; and (d) her left hand when her arm’s length her b

B. On August 20, 2019, at around 12:00, the Defendant: (a) stated that the victim’s vehicle located in the front of the F restaurant located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, would be able to perform a cream operation; (b) stated that the victim was able to believe that he was unable to perform a cream operation; (c) the victim was able to believe that she was notarial; (d) the victim was able to do so; and (d) stated that the victim was able to do so; and (e) the victim was tamped with her left hand.

C. At around 12:00 on September 19, 2019, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s face in front of the citizen playgrounds located in the Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-dong, such as the victim’s Doctrine Doctrine in the front of the citizen playgrounds, and the Doctrine of the victim’s face due to the Doctrine Doctrine and the Doctrine Doctrine.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts to charges: Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act; and

(b) Crimes of non-compliance with will: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act.

(c) Non-compliance with punishment: Application for non-compliance with punishment on May 26, 2020

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow