1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. In the first instance court, the Plaintiff sought payment of the lost income (ordinary damage KRW 3,970,000 and special damage KRW 42,00,00) and consolation money ( KRW 3,00,000) from the Defendant. The first instance court partially accepted the claim of consolation money and dismissed the claim of lost income.

In response, the defendant only appealed against the claim for consolation money, which is subject to the judgment of this court is limited to the claim for consolation money partially accepted as above.

2. The facts following the facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be found in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 3 to 7, 14, 15, and Eul evidence Nos. 21 to 25 (including the serial numbers).

The pertinent plaintiff of the parties from June 27, 198, has been working as a clerical staff at the certified judicial scrivener's office and attorney's office located in Ulsan-do and port areas. The defendant has been working as a certified judicial scrivener office from February 27, 199 in Daegu and Ulsan-do area.

B. On September 2012, the Defendant, including the Defendant’s accusation against the Plaintiff, submitted or accused the Plaintiff, etc. to an investigative agency on the ground that the Plaintiff was performing the affairs of a certified judicial scrivener in the Ulledo area after receiving a license certificate from a certified judicial scrivener.

The contents and results of the dispositions shall be as follows:

However, an accusation against the violation of the Subsidy Management Act and the Resident Registration Act No. 5 is filed from May 22, 2015 to the plaintiff.

9. It is related to the reduction of shipping fares and the moving-in report on May 22, 2015 with respect to the reduction of shipping fares up to 30.30.

on September 2012, 1200 of the date of the disposition of the name of the accused accused case as the date of accusation of No. 1 of the Table 1.

1. C

2. Non-existence of the second immediately preceding two days of the date on which he was suspected of having been suspected of having committed a violation of the Certified Judicial Scriveners Act by the Daegu District Prosecutors' Office 2012 Petition No. 148;

1. D;

2. A person suspected of having committed a violation of the Certified Judicial Scriveners Act by the Daegu District Prosecutors' Office 2013 type No. 5383, Apr. 23, 2013.