Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A As a representative of E, around January 6, 201, a person who was entrusted by the said F, etc. with the construction work of building reports and the construction work of building sites for the creation of penta and housing sites by one other, F, and one other for the installation of penta and housing sites, and who was entrusted with the construction work of building sites for 14,479 square meters of 14,479 square meters of Gyeonggi-gun G forest land in Gyeonggi-gu, the area for which permission for the diversion of a mountainous district was granted, and Defendant B is a person who directly performs the construction work of civil works

The Defendants, while carrying out the said construction, agreed to create a legal surface on a forest outside the boundary of a permitted site, and used the said land without permission from the competent administrative agency on October 201, 201 by cutting standing timber and cutting, banking, and shotizing standing timber, using 3,727 square meters of forest land located outside the said permitted site, from among 14,479 square meters of forest land in Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-do, without obtaining permission from the competent administrative agency.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to divert the mountainous district without permission from the competent authorities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against the defendant A or B;

1. Each statement of H;

1. Guide map;

1. Determination as to Defendant A and his/her defense counsel’s assertion on illegal site photographs

1. Defendant A had already damaged the place outside the permitted site, and Defendant A received a report, and did not publicly recruit the conversion of a mountainous district.

2. The circumstances revealed by each evidence mentioned above, namely, that Defendant B’s construction work in the area where permission was granted, partly arranged the part outside the permitted site outside the permitted site, and thereafter Defendant B reported the above facts to Defendant A, and Defendant A expressed to the effect that the law should not be cut and the sloped at the time was cut and filled up, etc., the law is applicable to the sloped area.