A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. No person who violates the Game Industry Promotion Act shall provide game products with contents different from those rated by the Game Rating Board for the distribution or use thereof;

The defendant from March 11, 201 to the same year.

4. Until December, 12, in D Gameland located in C at the city, set up and run a 30 game machine, and the normal sea-line game was rated by the Game Rating Board to make certain character images, such as strings, water bags, and strings, play a role simply in creating a game interest. However, unlike the contents, if a water-bring in the game machine appeared, 4 bookslocks in the game machine, 8 premiums if a string appeared, 20 premiums if a string appeared, 100 premiums if a string appeared, and 100 premiums if a string appeared, 8 game products that set a different quantity of premiums discharged depending on the appearing of a specific character image such as a gift discharge, were provided to unspecified customers.

As a result, the Defendant provided game products for use, which are game products different from those classified by the Game Rating Board.

2. No person who violates the Act on Special Cases concerning the Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc. shall engage in the speculative business by using slot machines or speculative gaming machines, other than the speculative business;

The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), set up 30 game products, which are game products and speculative gaming machines, different from those rated by the Game Rating Board, and provided them to unspecified customers, and operated money exchange business in a manner that receives a request for money exchange of KRW 4,500 per unit from customers who used the game, and provides them with KRW 4,500 per unit.

Accordingly, the defendant was engaged in speculative activities that cause property benefits or losses to customers by using speculative gaming machines.

3. Bodily injury.