logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.10.06 2016누38152
이의재결취소 및 손실보상금증액
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: "No. 4" in the first instance court's 6th, 21th, referring to "No. 9" in the second instance court's 7th, referring to "No. 9" in the second instance court's 19th, and "(the Seoul High Court, while making a decision in lieu of conciliation, deducts "the arithmetic mean of the values of the defendant 1 and the second appraised values of certain land among the disputed land" in the purchase price agreed by the plaintiff and the defendant, but such facts alone are the same as the part of the grounds for the first instance court's judgment in addition to adding "the average of the values of the second appraised values of some land among the disputed land" in the second instance's 19th, 200, and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow