1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff asserts that, based on the executory exemplification of the judgment stated in the purport of the claim against E, the Defendants seized the articles listed in the attached list on September 11, 2018, and that the above articles are owned by the Plaintiff, and that compulsory execution should not be permitted.

However, it is not sufficient to recognize that the above articles are owned by the plaintiff only with the evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 4 of the evidence Nos. 3-1, 2, and 4, and there is no

Rather, according to the evidence No. 2, E and his children, the executor, at the time of the execution of the seizure of the above articles, were in the apartment at the same time, but they did not raise any objection to the execution officer.

The Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is dismissed in entirety as it is difficult to accept.