logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2015.08.28 2015가단9404
제3자이의
Text

1. The Defendant’s executory exemplification of the payment order (Seoul Northern District Court 2014Da35387) against Nonparty B is the Seoul Northern District Court.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On June 11, 2015, the Defendant, based on the original copy of the payment order indicated in the Disposition No. 1, enforced compulsory execution against each of the items listed in the separate sheet.

B. B only contains the above goods C and 102, and the above goods are owned by the Plaintiff as they are purchased by the Plaintiff. Therefore, compulsory execution against the above goods should be dismissed.

2. Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts;

arrow