A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is engaged in the manufacturing business of H beamline with the trade name of “E” in Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City D.

1. A person who intends to install a painting facility with three-year or more power violating the Clean Air Conservation Act, or a sloping facility with a power of twenty-year or more, shall file a report on installation of air emission facilities with the competent authority;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without filing a report on installation of air emission facilities with the competent authority from November 8, 2014 to April 24, 2015, installed and operated a 20-year-hour 1st and 50-year-hour 1st and 50-year-hour 1st and 50-year-hour 1st and 50-year-long

2. A person who intends to install a sloping or compressed machine with a power violating the Noise and Vibration Control Act exceeding 10 miles shall report the installation of noise emission facilities to the competent authority;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without reporting noise emission facilities to the competent authority from November 8, 2014 to April 24, 2015, installed and operated a compressed machine with 20-macific 20-macific 1 and 50-macific 50-macific 1, a noise emission facility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on detection and a business trip;

1. Application of investigation reports (E factory site utilization plan compilation) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the facts constituting an offense, Articles 90 subparagraph 1 and 23 (1) of the Clean Air Conservation Act, and Articles 58 (1) and 8 (1) of the Noise and Vibration Control Act (Selection of Imprisonment) of the Noise and Vibration Control Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and community service order is that the defendant continues to commit a crime even though he/she had the history of a fine of the same kind, and the circumstances after committing the crime are not good enough to present materials that practically discontinued his/her business and do not repeat the same kind of crime, and thus, appears to reflect the crime. The fact that there is no history exceeding the fine, the defendant's family environment, health conditions, and other circumstances and conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case are considered.