A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 8, 2015, around 00:40, the injured Defendant collected his mobile phone to the victim D's E-cab in front of the members of the Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-si, and got off from the said taxi, and the victim gets out of the said taxi, and gets out of the said taxi, when the victim gets out of the taxi, she fats his fat, cut down his fat, cut down his fat, cut down his fat, and down his fat, and fats fats fats fat of the victim’s left side with the right drinking.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as a pain on the left-hand class in need of treatment for about two weeks.

2. On February 8, 2015, at around 01:10 on February 8, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the victim H (33 years old) face of the police box affiliated with the above police box, who attempted to sit in the front line in order to investigate the Defendant arrested in the act of committing an injury as prescribed in paragraph (1), from the G police box located in F of the Masan-si, Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do, on one occasion at his own head.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation of a flagrant offender arrested by a police officer, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the cutting of a pellet that requires treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under the suspended sentence is that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case, the defendant agreed with the victim D after the indictment of this case, the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, the defendant does not reach an agreement with the police officer H, the defendant does not have any record of committing the crime, and the defendant does not have any economic condition as a foreigner.