beta
Text
1. A deed drawn up on April 29, 2013 by a notary public against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) by the Defendant (Counterclaim Defendant).
Reasons
1. The main text of the facts is to consider both a principal lawsuit and a counterclaim.
The following facts are not disputed between the parties, or may be acknowledged by Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 3, Gap evidence 4, Gap evidence 5, Gap evidence 6, Gap evidence 9, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 2, Eul evidence 2, witness C, and Eul evidence.
Around June 10, 201 to June 5, 2012, D, the Plaintiff’s wife, borrowed a total of KRW 109,325,00 from the Defendant (hereinafter “instant loan”), and around April 2013, issued to the Defendant a certificate of borrowing KRW 111,750,00,000, in addition to the principal and interest of the instant loan.
B. On April 29, 2013, a notary public, on the 13-19th floor of the Taesung-dong 13-19 [Seoul-gu, Daegu-dong, 367, Dong-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Daegu-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong] among the Defendant, D, and the Plaintiff, on behalf of all of the obligors, prepared a notarial deed of debt repayment agreement (hereinafter “notarial deed of this case”) with the following content from the Yama Law Firm at No. 1252, 2013.
Article 1 The obligor has accepted the fact that the obligor has assumed the obligation to the obligee under this Agreement and has promised to jointly and severally repay the obligation under this Agreement provisions, and the obligee has approved the date of occurrence of the obligation. - Kind of obligation - Loans - Loans - Loans - Loans - Loans - Loans 11,750,000,000 won per annum of 30% per annum of May 6, 2013 (Interest) of Article 30% per annum of 30% per annum of the above amount, if the obligor delays the repayment of the above amount, the late payment damages shall be paid to the obligee at the rate of 30% per annum of the delayed amount.
Article 8 (Recognition and Recognition of Compulsory Execution) When the obligor fails to perform a pecuniary obligation under this contract, the obligor recognized the absence of objection against the obligee immediately through compulsory execution.
C. The Plaintiff’s early May 2013.