logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2020.05.14 2019고단968
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

The punishment of defendants shall be one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 20:25 on May 20, 2019, the Defendant was driving a Rablow Cargo Vehicle B without a vehicle driver’s license in the section of approximately 200 meters prior to the 200-distance of the pawnjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) driving the same freight vehicle without a driver’s license, and driving the same freight vehicle in the same manner with a two-lane distance from the direction of the intersection to the transmitting 203-lane.

The Defendant failed to comply with the duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes and safely driving them, etc., and failed to properly observe the duty of care to prevent accidents due to the failure of smoke, and led C (54 years old) who stops on the part of the motor vehicle in front of the cargo vehicle, and led C (54 years old) to the motor vehicle in front of the collision.

C has suffered wounds, such as salt ties, tensions, etc., in need of treatment for approximately two weeks.

The Defendant caused a traffic accident by occupational negligence and caused the injury of the victim C.

3. On May 20, 2019, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (e.g., refusal of measurement) (e., violation of the Road Traffic Act) was required to take the measurement of drinking three minutes between around 30 minutes and 30 minutes from around 21:38 of the same day, on the road in front of the 203 pawnjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City), since there was a reasonable ground to recognize that the Defendant driven the foregoing cargo under the influence of drinking, such as smelling and smelling on the face of the Defendant from the police box belonging to the police box of the Taejin-jin Police Station, which was dispatched to the site after receiving the report of the said traffic accident.

However, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's request for measurement without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of a survey report on actual condition and the control of drinking driving;

1. A statement hearing report (C);

1. Statement on the circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow