logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.08.13 2019고단1769
주민등록법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A person who is a member of the telephone financial fraud (one-time, one-time, one-time, and one-time, one-time, one-way, one-way, one-way, one-way, one-way, one-way, one-way, one-way, one-way, one-way, one-way, one-way, one-way, one-way, one-way, one-way, one-way, one-way, one-way, and another-way, and another-way, and another-way, and another-way, one-way, one-way, one-way, one-way, and another-way,

On February 2, 2019, the Defendant promised to receive KRW 100,000 per day when the Defendant received or failed to collect part of the collected money as performance money, under the direction of 'C' from a person who was not the deceased in his name, by pretending the employees of the lending company.

1. On April 10, 2019, the person who was unaware of the name of fraudulent aiding and abetting may misrepresent the victim D in currency with the victim’s D and make a loan to the E employee’s 32 points at the nearest location, and “if credit is supplemented by the nearest point 32 points, the loan may be made at an interest rate of 5% up to 25 million won. In order to enhance credit rating, the person who was unaware of the name of fraudulent aiding and abetting the loan from the G Bank stated that the loan

However, in fact, the person who was not an employee of E was not an employee of E, and there was no intention or ability to provide loans to the victim.

On April 12, 2019, the person under whose name the victim was named, had the victim remit the amount of KRW 12 million out of the amount loaned from G bank to H bank account in the name of H, and had H withdraw withdraw it.

On April 12, 2019, the Defendant, around 11:20, 200, 12 million won that was withdrawn as above, while having completed the completion on the road near the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Building, which was one’s employee, was driving at the same place.

Accordingly, the defendant, who is a delivery book, deceivings the victim who was unaware of the name of the telephone financial fraud organization.

arrow