logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.04.20 2018고정209
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is engaged in the operation of unregistered Oral Ba (100C).

1. On September 26, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act: (a) driven the above vehicle while driving the vehicle at around 08:15, and driving the vehicle at a speed of two lanes from the street of the Pungdong Pungdong Pungdong (hereinafter “Pungdong Pungdong”) to a long speed of bad distance, and (b) the Defendant was temporarily driving the vehicle at a crosswalk of the 3-lane distance driven by the victim B ( South, 28 years) prior to the two-lanes depending on the same area of the road.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall accurately operate the steering gear, brakes and other devices of the motor vehicle, shall not drive the motor vehicle at such a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and injury on others according to the traffic conditions of the motor vehicle and the structure and performance of the motor vehicle, and has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely reporting the traffic situation of the motor vehicle and safely driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so while under the influence of alcohol, and prior to the fact that the defendant neglected to stop temporarily in front of the crosswalk, and then, the defendant started to see the right side of the damaged vehicle before the crosswalk, and then the defendant started to see it completely.

As a result, the Defendant damaged the part of the above damaged vehicle by negligence in the course of business to be in excess of KRW 133,680.

2. Defendant 1 driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol level (0.147%) with a distance of about 500 meters from the upper and lower distance of the same kind from the ambalk-dong in the Asia-si in the above day to the same solar distance.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Insurance Act, without purchasing mandatory insurance on the first day and operated the said automobile.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of traffic accidents B;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver in charge; and

arrow