logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2019.01.11 2018고정514
위증
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the Defendants did not pay the above fines, they shall be prohibited.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 13, 2017, Defendant A appeared as a witness of the Suwon District Court No. 205, which is located in Sjuju City-ro 21-12, Sinju-ro 21-12 on November 13, 2017, and was notified of the right to refuse to testify.

In the above court, the Defendant testified as follows: ① “I am on the part of the Defendant’s hand and sexual scam in contact with D’s body” to the counsel’s question, “I am on the part of the Defendant’s body, and you see whether or not I am on the part of the Defendant’s body,” ② “I am on the part of the Defendant’s body, not on the part of his own body, but on the part of the Defendant’s body, I am on the part of the Defendant’s body, and I am on the part of the Defendant’s body.” ③ I am on the part of the counsel, “I am on the part of the Defendant’s body, I am on the part of the Defendant’s body,” and ③ I am on the part of the Defendant’s body, “I am on the part of the Defendant’s body, I am on the part of the Defendant’s body.”

However, in fact, around 10:20 on March 26, 2017, C used a lux of the second floor entrance of the Fridge E in Ischeon-si, the Defendant’s lux of D’s shouldered up to two times. Therefore, the Defendant’s lux of the lux of D was not in contact with C’s will in the process of cutting off the luxle and responding to D.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. On November 27, 2017, Defendant B was present as a witness of the Defendant’s case, such as assault against C, etc. of the said court No. 205, the Suwon District Court No. 21-12, Suju-si, Suju-si, Suju-si, 2017, around 15:00, and was notified of the right to refuse to testify.

In the above court, the Defendant refers to the prosecutor’s question, “at the time, whether the Defendant was spite against G”.

arrow