logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2021.02.05 2020고합518
자살방조
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 13, 2019, the Defendant, at around 03:50 on or after the end of November 13, 2019, was under the usual possession of the Defendant, who was accompanied by suicide from the victim C ( South, 63 years old) who was under the teaching system at the time when the Defendant’s house located in Busan Dong-gu, Busan.

After the victim and the victim have resolved to commit suicide together with the tax exemption, dump 10 in the house is dumped by dividing the 10th in the house into the breath victim.

As above, the Defendant attempted to commit suicide with the victim, and caused the victim to commit suicide at the same place from around that time to November 14:10, 2019, such as stroke-mm, and acute addiction by alcohol, thereby aiding and abetting the victim to commit suicide.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement made by the police in relation to D, E, and F;

1. Written records of autopsy, written opinion on autopsy, report on the results of field identification, field photographs, request for cooperation in investigation, and replys (the details of medical treatment of a sick person of the Health Insurance Corporation);

1. The Defendant asserts to the effect that he/she received a long period of depression, etc. and was in the state of mental disorder at the time of committing the crime, and that he/she was in the state of drinking alcohol at the time of committing the crime. The Defendant asserted to the effect that he/she was in the state of mental disorder at the time of committing the crime.

However, according to each evidence of the judgment, although the defendant was found to have received a mental treatment, in light of the circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence and the defendant's behavior before and after the crime, it does not seem that the defendant did not have the ability to discern things or make decisions in the process of carrying them into practice after drinking alcohol with the victim as stated in the judgment.

The laws and regulations;

arrow