beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 17,935,760 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from October 28, 201 to January 16, 2014.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant is a main complex building located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which is a parking lot for the fourth to second underground floors (hereinafter “instant parking lot”). The Defendant is an organization consisting of occupants of the above apartment among the above apartment units B composed of the first to fourth underground floors, and the sixth to twenty-one floors above the ground, and the Plaintiff is a managing body. From August 2006, the Plaintiff is a person who operated the postnatal care center in the above B 4th floor with the trade name “D postnatal care center.”
B. On October 13, 201, between around 12:00 and around 16:00, the Defendant performed annual disinfection in the instant parking lot (hereinafter “instant annually disinfection”); from around 07:00 on October 21, 201 to October 19:00 on the vehicle entrance passage of the instant parking lot, the Defendant performed temporary painting construction work.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant painting work”). C.
The gas generated from the implementation of the instant smoke disinfection went into the postnatal care center of this case, and part of the her mother who was accommodated in the said center was unable to do so, and on the same day, 2 mothers left the postnatal care center at the early stage, and 1 mothers were paid part of the entrance fee by leaving the said center on the next day. The implementation of the instant painting construction led to 13 mothers, who were 13 women on the first day, left the postnatal care center at the early stage and were paid part of the entrance fee.
As such, the Plaintiff inevitably suspended the business from October 22 of the same year to October 27 of the same year and suspended the postnatal care center of this case, when the mother who was enrolled in the postnatal care center was her newborn baby and was left away from all, and no new mother was her babyd.
【In the absence of any dispute, there is no ground for recognition, the entry or video of the evidence of No. 1 through No. 19, and No. 2 through No. 6, the testimony, F, and the stock company of E.