Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the Dong representative of D Apartment-si, Namyang-si, D Apartment-si (hereinafter referred to as "the apartment of this case"), and Defendant B is the auditor of the apartment of this case, and the victim E is the chairperson of the council of occupants of the apartment of this case.

1. On November 25, 2016, Defendant A was under way at the Residents' Autonomous Council room of the instant apartment on or around November 25, 2016, and the victim was erroneous in the procedure for dismissal of the representative of the occupants to himself/herself.

As you continue to assert, I would like to am the victim “I am this kind of fargue since the president has since fargue, even though I am I am, I am, I am, I am, I am. I am. I am.

In addition, the victims were openly insultingd by referring to such a large sound as "this weather".

2. Defendant B, on the grounds described in paragraph 1 at the date, time, and place described in paragraph 1, for the same reasons as that stated in paragraph 1, stated in the victim, “I am with the chairperson, ambien, amben, amben, amben, amben, amben, amben, amben, amben, amben, amben, amben,” and “I amben,” and “I amben, amben, and ambened by amben. I amben.”

The victim openly insultingd the victim by taking a bath that “it shall grow up and take out.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each complaint book, each police record, and each record recording of the statements made to E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment regarding criminal facts: The Defendants shall be punished by a fine.

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are examined; the Defendants recognized the criminal facts of the instant case and against their mistakes; Defendant B did not have any history of criminal punishment; etc. are recognized as normal in favor of the Defendants.

However, the defendants are the defendants.