1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

(a) Plaintiff’s entry into the Republic of Korea and application for recognition of refugee - Entry: A - Entry: May 1, 2007 (Status C-3) - Application for recognition of refugee: January 16, 2017

Defendant’s decision to recognize refugee status as of June 25, 2019 (hereinafter “instant disposition”): The ground does not constitute “a well-founded fear of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Refugee Convention and Article 1 of the Refugee Protocol.

C. Plaintiff’s filing of objection - The Minister of Justice’s filing of objection on August 23, 2019 – the dismissal decision on December 23, 2019 [Grounds for recognition] Gap’s 1, 2, Eul’s 1 through 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion is more than 10 years since he/she has resided with his/her parents in the Republic of Korea and is more familiar with Ghana, so there is a problem of communication when he/she wishes to live continuously in the Republic of Korea and return to Ghana, and it will be subject to emotional and psychological harm.

The plaintiff is likely to be threatened by the threat of the plaintiff's referral as follows, so it is highly likely that the plaintiff might be injured if he/she go to Ghana, and this constitutes a reasonable fear.

Therefore, the instant disposition is unlawful.

① Around June 2015, the Plaintiff’s penalty system, who was residing in AB, was threatened with and assaulted by C and his six daily allowances, finding the whereabouts of the Plaintiff and his/her wife.

② Around 2014, the Plaintiff referred the Republic of Korea to the Plaintiff for college admission.

D was found to have used a forged passport and was forced to leave the Republic of Korea on December 7, 2015, it was doubtful that the Plaintiff reported to the Plaintiff.

D continued to send the Plaintiff’s text message “I cannot go off because I reported D', I will not go off.”

③ The Plaintiff’s work was conducted from Ghana to E as a party member.

On the other hand, D and their families are F members.

Therefore, the plaintiff.