1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 25, 2007, Plaintiff B, her husband, entered the Republic of Korea with a short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status as of April 25, 2007, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on January 6, 2017 in the case of violation of the Immigration Control Act, etc. by the Seoul Central District Court 2016Kadan5689, which was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and six months.

B Upon receipt of a deportation order from the head of Seoul Immigration and Foreigners' Office on January 9, 2017, the same year

4. The departure of Korea was 26.

B. On May 1, 2007, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with a short-term general status (C-3, and 15 days of sojourn) sojourn status on July 11, 2007, and when the husband B was forced to retire as above, the Plaintiff was denied the extension of the accompanying sojourn status on January 5, 2017.

C. On January 16, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant. On June 25, 2019, the Defendant rendered a decision to deny refugee status on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion against the Plaintiff does not constitute “a well-founded fear of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Refugee Convention and Article 1 of the Refugee Protocol.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”) D.

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on August 13, 2019, but was dismissed on December 23, 2019.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 6 and 7, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. On June 2015, the Plaintiff’s claimed children were assaulted and threatened by the daily day C, which is the primary business partner of the Plaintiff’s secondhand business in Baria.

B was intended to enable D to enter a school in Korea, but D was found to have used a forged passport at the Immigration and Immigration Office for entry into and departure from Korea and forced to withdraw from Korea.

D sent to B a letter of intimidation stating that “poner and his family members shall not go beyond Ghana,” in suspicion that B reported the use of his forged passport.

The plaintiff and their children are from the day C when they return home to Korea.