1. Defendant C: (a) 3,250,000 won, 300,000 won, 300,000 won, and 3,000 won, respectively, to Plaintiff (Appointed Party).

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Appointor D and E are married couple, and H apartment 402 Dong, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

) Each of the 303-1/2 equity right holders is the Plaintiff (Appointed Party; hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”) who is the Plaintiff.

(2) The Plaintiff B and the Selection F are married couples of the instant apartment building Nos. 303 with A, and they are the right holder of the instant apartment building Nos. 203, respectively, and their children are residing in the instant apartment building No. 203 with G.

3) Defendant C completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the instant apartment Nos. 403 on September 4, 2009, and resides in No. 403, and Defendant C’s living real estate trust (hereinafter “Defendant C”) on May 20, 2016.

(B) On July 2016, Plaintiff B found that the ownership of the instant apartment was available in the instant apartment house 203, and requested the management office of the instant apartment to find water sources to the management office of the instant apartment.

On August 2016, the management office explained these circumstances in the apartment No. 303 of this case and found that 303 of the 303 of the finding of the water sources of the following floor could also be stored in the ceiling.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant water leakage” in total, among the water leakages in heading 203 and 303. From October 201 to November 201, 2016, Plaintiff A, with respect to KRW 303, performed pipeline testing and public bathing construction works, waterproofing construction works around the washing hole, and sprinkler repair inspections in a tent between October 201 and November 201, and disbursed KRW 1,150,000 in total with the aforementioned construction and inspection expenses, however, the instant water leakage continued despite the said construction works.

Plaintiff

A around the beginning of November 2016, the water leakage detection of No. 303 was conducted. At this time, A received the opinion from the water leakage detection business entity that the water leakage detection business entity could have a water leakage source of the upper floor, and from November 2016, A was the defendant.