1. The Defendant paid KRW 2,430,00 to the Plaintiff KRW 5% per annum from July 16, 2015 to January 22, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is residing in No. 103, 904, and the defendant is residing in the above apartment as the owner of No. 1004, the immediate upper floor of the apartment of this case, the same apartment of this case.

B. Around October 24, 2014, the number of water leakages occurred in the part of the Plaintiff’s inner ceiling, and thus, the apartment management office of this case increased the construction of the following areas. The employee of the apartment management office of this case deducted water by excavating the natural ceiling remote areas, and removed part of the natural ceiling remote areas.

C. The Plaintiff did not perform water leakage prevention works by asserting that the Defendant could not perform water leakage prevention works because he/she was unable to find water leakage sources, and the Plaintiff did not perform the water leakage prevention works. The Plaintiff removed a ceiling, a remote area and a stone site of a living room toilet from June 23, 2015 to June 24, 2015, and performed the excavation and waterproof work, and performed the excavation and waterproof work. D.

D, in order to carry out the above waterproof and design works and to carry out the above waterproof and design works, she removed the inner stream, removed the scope of a toilet connected after the removal of the inner stream, and discovered a water leakage trace such as an inner stream, thereby executing the waterproof and design works on the ceiling of the inner stream and the cell toilet.

[Based on recognition] Each description and image of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 13 (including paper numbers), witness E, and D's testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the parties’ assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s part of exclusive ownership owned and managed by the Defendant started water leakage, and water leakage was proceeding due to the gap in the inside room and room toilets in which the Plaintiff lives, and water was raised, thereby causing damage to the Plaintiff to incur expenses incurred in waterproofing and drawing water. Since the Defendant did not repair for a long time, and the Defendant suffered a big mental pain, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for property damage and consolation money.

B. It cannot be said that the Defendant’s exclusive ownership commences.